🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are observing closely to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of nations are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and apps are "taking away our kids' innocence". The policy could be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked the legislature to approve a proposal lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised families to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding motion calling for a ban for minors unless guardian approval is granted. While it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these services, the step does not create binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a good foundation," said a leading European lawmaker driving the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in robust data".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the government pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a girl who died after viewing disturbing online content argues that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are safe and fit for young users," said a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, action is largely unfolding at the state level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with any further access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills demanding parental consent for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from some individuals to follow the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Outside of Europe and the US, other nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, global bodies strike a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve user protection.

As this international discussion unfolds, the actions of this nation and others show that states globally are increasingly content to wait for platforms to self-regulate.